Comparison of adherence of Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis to silicone catheters in vitro and in vivo

Objective Although Candida parapsilosis has been associated with device-related infections in the clinical settings, factors that contribute to this association have not been previously examined. The objectives of this study were to compare in vitro and in vivo the adherence to silicone catheters of: (1) Candida albicans vs. C. parapsilosis , and (2) invasive vs. colonizing isolates of C. albicans and C. parapsilosis . Methods The records of 840 patients who had had Candida species isolated at three teaching hospitals during a three-month period were reviewed. A total of 20 clinical isolates of each of C. parapsilosis and C. albicans were examined for their adherence to silicone catheters in vitro and in a rabbit model of percutaneously placed catheters. For each Candida species, ten invasive isolates that had caused clinical device-related infection and 10 colonizing isolates that had caused only device colonization were studied. Results Candida parapsilosis accounted for <5% of yeast isolates from all sites, while three-quarters were C. albicans . Candida parapsilosis was isolated proportionately more often from blood and/or devices than C. albicans (34.3% vs. 8.5%, respectively, P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in the degrees of adherence in vitro and in vivo between C. albicans and C. parapsilosis or between invasive and colonizing Candida . Conclusion Although C. parapsilosis was isolated proportionately more often from blood and/or devices than C. albicans in our studied population, there was no significant difference in the adherence of the two Candida species to silicone, nor between invasive and colonizing Candida in our in vitro and in vivo models. Factors other than microbial adherence may help explain the observed association of C. parapsilosis with device-related infections.