4.5 Article

Effect of surface tension of mucosal lining liquid on upper airway mechanics in anesthetized humans

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 95, Issue 1, Pages 357-363

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01198.2002

Keywords

obstructive sleep apnea; general anesthesia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Upper airway (UA) patency may be influenced by surface tension (gamma) operating within the (UAL). We examined the role of gamma of UAL in the maintenance of UA patency in eight isoflurane-anesthetized supine human subjects breathing via a nasal mask connected to a pneumotachograph attached to a pressure delivery system. We evaluated 1) mask pressure at which the UA closed (Pcrit), 2) UA resistance upstream from the site of UA collapse (RUS), and 3) mask pressure at which the UA reopened (Po). A multiple pressure-transducer catheter was used to identify the site of airway closure ( velopharyngeal in all subjects). UAL samples (0.2 mul) were collected, and the gamma of UAL was determined by using the pull-off force technique. Studies were performed before and after the intrapharyngeal instillation of 5 ml of exogenous surfactant ( Exosurf, Glaxo Smith Kline). The gamma of UAL decreased from 61.9 +/- 4.1 ( control) to 50.3 +/- 5.0 mN/m ( surfactant; P < 0.02). Changes in Po, RUS, and Po - Pcrit ( change = control - surfactant) were positively correlated with changes in γ ( r(2) > 0.6; P < 0.02) but not with changes in Pcrit (r(2) = 0.4; P > 0.9). In addition, mean peak inspiratory airflow ( no flow limitation) significantly increased ( P < 0.04) from 0.31 +/- 0.06 ( control) to 0.36 +/- 0.06 l/s ( surfactant). These findings suggest that γ of UAL exerts a force on the UA wall that hinders airway opening. Instillation of exogenous surfactant into the UA lowers the γ of UAL, thus increasing UA patency and augmenting reopening of the collapsed airway.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available