4.1 Article

Escitalopram (10-20 mg/day) is effective and well tolerated in a placebo-controlled study in depression in primary care

Journal

INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages 211-217

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00004850-200307000-00003

Keywords

antidepressant; citalopram; efficacy; enantiomer; escitalopram; flexible dose; MADRS; major depressive disorder; SSRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Escitalopram was compared to placebo in moderately to severely depressed patients in primary care with citalopram as the active reference. Patients were randomized to receive flexible doses of 10-20 mg/day escitalopram (n = 155), 20-40 mg/day citalopram (n = 160), or placebo (n = 154) over an 8-week double-blind period. The primary efficacy parameter was the change from baseline to last assessment in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale total score. Escitalopram produced a statistically significant therapeutic difference of 2.9 points (P = 0.002) compared to placebo, and escitalopram was consistently and statistically significantly more efficacious than placebo from week 1 onwards. Analysis of Clinical Global Impression-Severity and Clinical Global Impression-improvement confirmed the primary efficacy results. By week 8, significantly more patients had responded to treatment with escitalopram than with citalopram (P = 0.021) or placebo (P = 0.009). Escitalopram was as well tolerated as citalopram and had a similar adverse event profile. Both escitalopram- and citalopram-treated patients had placebo-level adverse event withdrawal rates (3% and 4%, respectively). This study demonstrates the consistent antidepressant efficacy and excellent tolerability of escitalopram 10-20 mg/day in primary care patients with major depressive disorder. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 18:211-217 (C) 2003 Lippincott Williams Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available