Journal
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages 833-851Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1049732303013006005
Keywords
proposal evaluation; qualitative research; standards
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Although they complain that qualitative proposals are not reviewed fairly when funding agencies use quantitative criteria, qualitative researchers have failed the system by not developing alternative criteria for the evaluation of qualitative proposals. In this article, the author corrects this deficit by presenting criteria to assess the relevance, rigor, and feasibility of qualitative research. These criteria are not a checklist but rather a series of questions that can aid a reviewer, adept in qualitative methods, to comprehensively evaluate and defend qualitative research.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available