4.7 Article

Active microbial RNA turnover in a grassland soil estimated using a 13CO2 spike

Journal

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 35, Issue 7, Pages 877-885

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00117-2

Keywords

C-13; SMB; rhizosphere; bacteria; DNA

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rhizosphere microbes are critical to the initial transfer and transformation of root carbon inputs to the soil but our understanding of the activity of these organisms remains constrained by their limited culturability. In this study we combined isotopic C-13 tracer and molecular approaches to measure the incorporation of recently assimilated plant C into soil microbial RNA and DNA pools as a means to determine the turnover of the 'active' rhizosphere community. This required the development of a method for the extraction, purification and preparation of small-sample soil DNA and RNA (< 5 mug C) for isotope analysis. Soil, plant and respired CO2 samples were collected from a (CO2)-C-13 pulse-chase experiment at intervals for 20 days post-labelling. The peak of C-13 release in soil/root respired CO2 came between 5 and 48 h after (CO2)-C-13 pulse-labelling and was followed by a secondary peak of soil heterotroph C-13 respiration after 136 h. Results showed that both soil DNA and RNA rapidly incorporated recent photosynthate with greatest 13C found in the 'active' microbial RNA fraction reflecting higher rates of microbial RNA turnover. The dilution rate of the pulse derived C-13 in RNA-C was used to estimate a microbial RNA turnover of approximately 20% day(-1) with a 15-20 day residence time for photosynthate derived C-13 in the RNA pool. The findings of this work confirm the rapid transfer of photosynthate C inputs through soil microorganisms to the atmosphere as CO2 and the potential of the biomolecular-isotope tracer approach in soil C research. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available