4.5 Article

Red blood cell support and alloimmunization rate against erythrocyte antigens in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Journal

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages 231-236

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1704114

Keywords

RBC transfusion; alloimmunization; stem cell transplantation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We retrospectively analyzed red blood cell (RBC) support and alloimmunization rate in 218 consecutive patients-128 from the Pediatric Department and 90 from the adult Hematology Department-undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) between 1994 and 2000. In the pre-HSCT period, the pediatric patients undergoing auto-HSCT required more RBC support. In the post-HSCT period, pediatric patients transplanted with an unrelated donor required more RBC support (median 13.5 U/10 kg bw) than patients receiving HSCT from a related donor (median 6 U/10 kg bw) or from an autologous source (median 4 U/10 kg bw, P=0.0004). In the pre-HSCT period, 159 out of 218 patients (73%) received a total of 1843 RBC units, with an overall median of 9 U/patient over a median of 24 months (range 4-62); 10 patients (6%) developed a total of 12 alloantibodies, with an alloimmunization rate of 5.4/1000 RBC units. In the post-HSCT period, all but three patients were given a total of 2420 RBC units, with an overall median of 6 U/patient over a median of 4 months (range 1-18); all but one of the pre-existing alloantibodies disappeared and three patients (1%) developed new alloantibodies with an alloimmunization rate of 1.2/1000 RBC units. These newly produced alloantibodies (one anti-M and two anti-E) were detected at +58, +90 and +210 days after HSCT. These findings might suggest a different approach to alloantibody screening tests in patients receiving HSCT, with a subsequent reduction of costs and laboratory workload.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available