4.1 Article

Lactobacillus crispatus capsules:: Single-use safety study in the Macaca nemestrina model

Journal

SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES
Volume 30, Issue 7, Pages 568-570

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00007435-200307000-00007

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P51 RR000166, RR-00166] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [P01-AI39061, P01 AI039061] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Lactobacillus crispatus is a part of the normal vaginal microflora of humans. Goal: The goal of this study was to assess whether a capsule containing an H2O2-producing strain of L crispatus (CTV-05) would alter the vaginal microflora and/or epithelial tissues when applied intravaginally in the pig-tailed macaque model. Study Design: Ten sexually mature female Macaca nemestrina were assessed at baseline for quantitative vaginal microbiology and vaginal pH and with colposcopy. One capsule containing 10(8) colony forming units of desiccated L crispatus CTV-05 was inserted into the vaginal fornix of each animal. Vaginal assessments were repeated on days 1 and 2 after capsule insertion. The L crispatus CTV-05 strain was identified with use of a DNA fingerprinting method. Results: Before product use, four of 10 animals had detectable levels of H2O2-producing lactobacilli. L crispatus CTV-05 was detected in 1 of 10 animals on day 1 and in 3 of 10 animals on day 2 following insertion of the capsule. There were no tissue changes observed by colposcopy. Vaginal pH decreased in two animals colonized by CTV-05, from 7.0 at baseline to 4.5 +/- 0.5 on days 1 and 2 after product use. Conclusions: A single intravaginal application of capsules containing 10(8) L crispatus CTV-05 resulted in vaginal colonization in three of 10 animals 2 days after use. The absence of colposcopic changes in the vagina/cervical tissues indicates that L crispatus capsules are well tolerated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available