4.5 Article

Effect of ventilatory rate on airway cytokine levels and lung injury

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 113, Issue 1, Pages 139-145

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-4804(03)00195-1

Keywords

alveolar edema; TNF alpha; IL-6; inflammation; cytokine; lung injury; mechanical ventilation; ventilator-induced lung injury; respiratory rate

Categories

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [1 K08 HL72836-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Controversy exists regarding the effect of large-volume mechanical ventilation (MV), as a sole stimulus, on the pulmonary cytokine milieu. We used a well described experimental model of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) to examine the impact of large volume ventilation on pulmonary cytokines in vivo and to study the effect of respiratory rate (RR) variation on these levels. Materials and methods: Sixty rats (410 +/- 47 g) were randomized to: 1) non ventilated control; 2) V-t = 40 ml/kg, RR = 40 bpm; 3) V-t = 40 ml/kg, RR = 20 bpm; 4) V-t = 7 ml/kg, RR = 40 bpm; or 5) V-t = 7 ml/kg, RR = 20 bpm. After 1 h of MV, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAIL) and serum were collected. BAL was analyzed for urea, protein, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)alpha and interleukin (IL)-6. Epithelial lining fluid volume (ELF) was calculated. Results. Regardless of RR, animals ventilated at 7 ml/kg did not differ from control in any outcome. In contrast, MV at 40 ml/kg V-t with 40 bpm produced lung injury characterized by significant elevations of BAL TNFalpha, IL-6, protein, ELF, and LDH. At 40ml/kg V-t, RR reduction (20 bpm) significantly reduced all injury measures. Conclusion: This study confirms that large-volume MV, as a sole stimulus, produces lung injury and cytokine release. Whereas increasing RR at low V-t has little impact on injury parameters, RR reduction under VILI-promoting conditions significantly limits lung injury. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available