4.5 Article

Paradoxical effects of prior activity on human sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase response to exercise

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 95, Issue 1, Pages 138-144

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00483.2002

Keywords

Ca2+ sequestering; continuous exercise; fatigue; vastus lateralis; SERCA isoforms

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To investigate the effects of intermittent heavy exercise (HE) on sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) maximal Ca2+-ATPase activity (V-max) and Ca2+ uptake, a continuous two-stage standardized cycling test was performed before and after HE by untrained men [peak aerobic power ((V) over dot O-2 peak) = 42.9 +/- 2.7 ml . kg(-1) . min(-1)]. The HE consisted of 16 bouts of cycling performed for 6 min each hour at 90% (V) over dot O-2 peak. Tissue was obtained from the vastus lateralis by needle biopsy before and during each cycle test. Before HE, reductions (P < 0.05; μmol . g protein(-1) . min(-1)) of 16 and 31% were observed in V-max and Ca2+ uptake, respectively, after 40 min of the standardized test. Resting V-max and Ca2+ uptake were depressed (P < 0.05) by 19 and 30%, respectively, when measured 36-48 h after HE. During the standardized test, after HE, V-max increased (P < 0.05) by 20%, whereas no change was observed in Ca2+ uptake. The HE protocol resulted in small increases (P < 0.05) and decreases (P < 0.05) in sarco(endo) plasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA) 2a and SERCA1 expression, respectively, as determined by Western blotting techniques. These results indicate that SR Ca2+-sequestering function in response to a prolonged exercise test depends on prior activity status, such that rested muscles exhibit a decrease and prior exercised muscles, an increase in Ca2+-ATPase activity. Moreover, it appears that changes in SERCA content can occur in response to a sustained session of intermittent exercise.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available