4.4 Article

Rapid, experience-induced enhancement in odorant discrimination by anterior piriform cortex neurons

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages 65-72

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00133.2003

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIDCD NIH HHS [DC-03906, R01 DC003906-02] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current views of odorant discrimination by the mammalian olfactory system suggest that the piriform cortex serves as a site of odor object synthesis. Given the enormous number of odorant feature combinations possible in nature, however, it seems unlikely that cortical synthetic receptive fields (RFs) are innate but rather require experience for their formation. The present experiment addressed two issues. First, we made a direct comparison of mitral/tufted cell and anterior piriform cortex (aPCX) neuron abilities to discriminate odorant mixtures from their components to further test whether aPCX neurons can treat collections of features different from the features themselves ( synthetic coding). Second, we attempted to determine the minimum duration of experience necessary for formation of cortical synthetic RFs. Single-unit recordings were made from mitral/tufted cells and aPCX layer II/III neurons in urethan-anesthetized rats. Cross-habituation between novel binary mixtures and their novel components was used to determine odor discrimination abilities. The results suggest that after greater than or equal to50 s of experience with a binary mixture, aPCX neurons can discriminate the mixture from its components, whereas mitral/tufted cells cannot. However, when limited to 10 s of experience with the mixture, aPCX neurons appear similar to mitral/tufted cells and do not discriminate mixtures from components. These results suggest experience-dependent synthetic processing in aPCX and suggest an important role for perceptual learning in normal odor discrimination.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available