3.8 Article

Isolation, characterization and expression analysis of a hypoxia-responsive glucose transporter gene from the grass carp, Ctenopharyngodon idellus

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 270, Issue 14, Pages 3010-3017

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03678.x

Keywords

Ctenopharyngodon idellus; glucose transporter; grass carp; hypoxia; split codon

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glucose transporters (GLUTs) have been implicated in adaptive and survival responses to hypoxic stress in mammals. In fish, the expression and regulation of GLUT in relation to hypoxia remains unexplored. Here we describe the identification of a hypoxia-responsive glucose transporter gene (gcGLUT ) and the corresponding full-length cDNA from the grass carp. The gene spans approximate to 11 kb of genomic sequence and consists of 12 exons and 11 introns, and an open reading frame (ORF) of 1599 bp encoding a polypeptide of 533 amino acids, with a predicted molecular mass of approximate to 57 kDa and a pI of 8.34. blastx analysis showed that the ORF shared high sequence identity with the GLUT1 (57-59%), GLUT3 (59-60%) and GLUT4 (55-59%) proteins from different vertebrates. Comparative analysis of GLUT genomic structures showed that the arrangement of exons and position of split codons are highly conserved amongst members of the class I GLUT s suggesting that these genes share a common ancestor. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that gcGLUT is most closely related to the GLUT3 proteins. Northern blot analysis showed that the 3.1-kb gcGLUT transcript was most abundantly expressed and responsive to hypoxia in kidney. Up-regulated expression by hypoxia was also evident in eye and gill, but differential patterns of expression were observed. Low expression levels detected in brain, heart, liver and muscle were not responsive to hypoxic stress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available