4.5 Article

Gene expression in colorectal cancer and in vitro chemosensitivity to 5-fluorouracil:: A study of 88 surgical specimens

Journal

CANCER SCIENCE
Volume 94, Issue 7, Pages 633-638

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2003.tb01495.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To predict the sensitivity of colorectal cancer to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), we compared the gene expression of surgically obtained colorectal cancer specimens with chemosensitivity to 5-FU as detected by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Eighty-eight patients with advanced and/or metastatic colorectal cancer provided written informed consent and entered the trial from September 2000 to October 2001. Fresh surgical specimens were used for the MTT assay, and sensitivity to 5-FU was evaluated at a cutoff concentration of 50 mug/ml and 48-h incubation time. Frozen samples were stored at -80degreesC until mRNA analysis of thymidylate synthetase (TS), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), thymidine phosphorylase (TP), esnucleoside transporter (NT), and E2F1 by real-time RT-PCR. The correlations between the variables were analyzed, and the predictive value of these mRNAs was assessed statistically using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. NT and DPD, TP and DPD, and TP and NT mRNA expression levels correlated significantly, while TS and E2F1 showed no correlations. High NT expression was associated with low sensitivity to 5-FU (P<0.013), as were high DPD and E2F1 expression (P<0.022 for both). High TP mRNA expression correlated with low sensitivity to 5-FU (P<0.034), although high TS mRNA expression did not. ROC curves indicated that DPD and NT mRNAs were possible predictors of sensitivity to 5-FU, with cutoff values of 0.6 and 0.4, respectively. The sensitivity of colorectal cancer to 5-FU may be regulated by DPD, the rate-limiting enzyme of catabolism, and NT, an important transmembrane transporter of nucleosides.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available