4.6 Article

The UARS microwave limb sounder version 5 data set: Theory, characterization, and validation

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
Volume 108, Issue D13, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2002JD002273

Keywords

Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS); Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (UARS); upper tropospheric humidity; stratospheric ozone; stratospheric composition; stratospheric chemistry

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [NER/A/S/2001/01177] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper describes the latest and (for most products) definitive data set from the Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) on the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (UARS). MLS data have formed the basis of numerous studies, and the version 5 data, produced using more advanced algorithms than earlier versions, represent a significant improvement in quality and scientific applicability for most of the MLS data products. The version 5 data include midstratospheric to lower mesospheric temperature and geopotential height (the latter is a new product from MLS), water vapor from the upper troposphere to the mesosphere, stratospheric and mesospheric ozone, and stratospheric nitric acid, chlorine monoxide, and methyl cyanide (also a new product). The vertical retrieval grid over the stratosphere and lower mesosphere has been doubled, to six surfaces per decade change in pressure (similar to2.5 km), compared to three surfaces per decade in previous versions. The accuracy and precision of lower stratospheric ozone, chlorine monoxide, and nitric acid have been improved. For each product, a description of relevant changes to the algorithms is given, along with an update on its validation, a description of the accuracy, precision, and vertical resolution of the data, and information on what quality control methods to apply when using the data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available