Journal
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
Volume 219, Issue 1-2, Pages 1-13Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(03)00106-6
Keywords
bipolar membrane; plasma; limiting cur-rent
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Ce4+-initiated and plasma-induced grafting polymerization was used to prepare bipolar membranes. The former method used the membrane of copoly(2-hydroxylethylene-methacrylate (2-HEMA)/n-butylacrylate (BA)/glycidyl-methacrylate (GMA)) on the surfaces of which were grafted acrylic acid (AA: -COO-) and 4-vinyl pyridine (4VP: -NH+Cl-), to prepare the bipolar membrane. The latter method utilized the porous PVDF membrane as a substrate, onto one side of which AA (or sodium vinyl sulfonate, SVS) monomer was grafted, and onto the other of which, 4-vinyl pyridine (or N',N-dimethyl amino ethyl acrylate. DMAEA) monomer was grafted. The contact angle of bipolar membranes dramatically decreased when the ionic polymer covered the surface of the membranes by plasma-grafting polymerization. Meanwhile, the swelling level of bipolar membranes was in the range of 25-50%. Furthermore, the cross-section SEM photographs of bipolar membranes further illustrated a sandwich structure that consisted of anionic polymer, cationic polymer and PVDF substrate. The limiting current increased with the diffusion coefficient and the concentration of electrolysis; however, the critical voltage was independent of the concentration and the kind of electrolysis. The 963 of AA-PVDF-DMAEA bipolar membrane exhibited the best ratio of dissociation rate constants (k(d)/k(d)(0)) of all membranes. Results concerning the efficiency of the current showed plasma-induced preparation of a bipolar membrane is better than Ce4+-initiated preparation. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available