4.6 Article

Functional cooperation of simian virus 40 promoter factor 1 and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein 8 and 5 in lipopolysaccharide-induced gene activation of IL-10 in mouse macrophages

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 171, Issue 2, Pages 821-828

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.2.821

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous studies have revealed that LPS can activate transcription of the IL-10 gene promoter through an SV40 promoter factor 1 (Sp1) binding site in mouse macrophage RAW264.7. In this study, we determined that, in addition to Sp1, C/EBPbeta and delta were also involved in LPS-induced gene expression of IL-10. By transient transfection with 5'-deletion mutants of the IL-10 promoter, we found that there were two LPS-responsive elements in the promoter of the mouse IL-10 gene. Analysis of these two regions by gel shift assay suggested that Sp1 and C/EBbeta and delta were bound to these two regions, respectively. By site-directed mutagenesis, we found that disruption at both the Sp1 and C/EBP binding sites almost completely blocked the LPS response. By gel shift assay and Western blotting, we found that the DNA binding complex and protein expression of C/EBbeta and delta were increased by LPS treatment, but these results were not found for Sp1. Overexpression of C/EBPbeta or C/EBPdelta, respectively, activated the promoter of the IL-10 gene, and they were enhanced by LPS. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments in intact cells indicated that LPS stimulated interaction between Sp1 and C/EBPbeta and delta. These results suggested that the interaction between Sp1 and C/EBPbeta and delta induced by LPS cooperatively activated expression of the IL-10 gene. The increase of C/EBPbeta and delta proteins and the enhancement of transactivation activity of C/EBPbeta and delta by LPS treatment, at least in part, explain the activation of IL-10 gene expression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available