4.8 Article

Photolytic cleavage of 1-(2-nitrophenyl)ethyl ethers involves two parallel pathways and product release is rate-limited by decomposition of a common hemiacetal intermediate

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 125, Issue 28, Pages 8546-8554

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja034354c

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Time-resolved FTIR spectroscopic studies of the flash photolysis of several 1-(2-nitrophenyl)ethyl ethers derived from aliphatic alcohols showed that a long-lived hemiacetal intermediate was formed during the reaction. Breakdown of this intermediate was rate-limiting for product release. One of these compounds (methyl 2-[1-(2-nitrophenyl)ethoxy] ethyl phosphate, 9) was studied in detail by a combination of time-resolved FTIR and UV-vis spectroscopy. In addition, product studies confirmed clean photolytic decomposition to the expected alcohol, 2-hydroxyethyl methyl phosphate, and the 2-nitrosoacetophenone byproduct. At pH 7.0, 1 degreesC, the rate constant for product release was 0.11 s(-1), very much slower than the 5020 s(-1) rate constant for decay of the photochemically generated aci-nitro intermediate (pH 7.0, 2 C). Time-resolved UV-vis measurements showed that the hemiacetal intermediate is formed by two competing pathways, with fast (similar to80% of the reaction flux) and slow (similar to20% of the flux) components. Only the minor, slower path is responsible for the observed aci-nitro decay process. These competing reactions are interpreted with the aid of semiempirical PM3 calculations of reaction barriers. Furthermore, AMSOL calculations indicate that the pK(a) of the nitronic acid isomer formed by photolysis is likely to determine partition into the alternate paths. These unusual results appear to be general for 1-(2-nitrophenyl)ethyl ethers and contrast with a related 2-nitrobenzyl ether that photolyzed without involvement of a long-lived hemiacetal.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available