Journal
SCIENCE
Volume 301, Issue 5631, Pages 358-360Publisher
AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.1085075
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
To interpret changes in biodiversity through geological time, it is necessary first to correct for biases in sampling effort related to variations in the exposure of rocks and recovery of fossils with age. Data from New Zealand indicate that outcrop area is likely to be a reliable proxy of rock volume in both stable cratonic regions, where the paleobiodiversity record is strongly correlated with relative sea level, and on tectonically active margins. In contrast, another potential proxy, the number of rock formations, is a poor predictor of outcrop area or sampling effort in the New Zealand case.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available