4.3 Article

Kakadumycins, novel antibiotics from Streptomyces sp NRRL 30566, an endophyte of Grevillea pteridifolia

Journal

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 224, Issue 2, Pages 183-190

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00426-9

Keywords

streptomycete; malaria; endophyte; tandem mass spectrometry; anthrax; DNA

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An endophytic streptomycete (NRRL 30566) is described and partially characterized from a fern-leaved grevillea (Grevillea pteridifolia) tree growing in the Northern Territory of Australia. This endophytic streptomycete produces, in culture, novel antibiotics - the kakadumycins. Methods are outlined for the production and chemical characterization of kakadumycin A and related compounds. This antibiotic is structurally related to a quinoxaline antibiotic, echinomycin. Each contains, by virtue of their amino acid compositions, alanine, serine and an unknown amino acid. Other biological, spectral and chromatographic differences between these two compounds occur and are given. Kakadumycin A has wide spectrum antibiotic activity, especially against Gram-positive bacteria, and it generally displays better bioactivity than echinomycin. For instance, against Bacillus anthracis strains, kakadumycin A has minimum inhibitory concentrations of 0.2-0.3 mug ml(-1) in contrast to echinomycin at 1.0-1.2 mug ml(-1). Both echinomycin and kakadumycin A have impressive activity against the malarial parasite Plasmotliumfulciparum with LD(50)s in the range of 7-10 ng ml(-1). In macromolecular synthesis assays both kakadumycin A and echinomycin have similar effects on the inhibition of RNA synthesis. It appears that the endophytic Streptomyces sp. offer some promise for the discovery of novel antibiotics with pharmacological potential. (C) 2003 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available