4.4 Article

Analysis of colorectal tumor progression by microdissection and comparative genomic hybridization

Journal

GENES CHROMOSOMES & CANCER
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages 369-380

Publisher

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/gcc.10201

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This investigation aimed to identify patterns of copy number change in colorectal tumor progression from adenoma to liver metastasis. Fifty-three microdissected sub-regions from 17 cases of colorectal cancer were assigned to one of six histopathologically defined categories: coexisting adenoma, tumor above the muscularis layer, tumor within the muscularis layer, tumor extending through the bowel wall to serosal fat, lymph node metastasis, and liver metastasis. Microdissected samples were treated by a microwave processing step and then used as templates for universal PCR amplification. PCR products were fluorophore labeled and subjected to comparative genomic hybridization. Copy number changes were found in all samples, and every chromosome arm (excluding acrocentric short arms) was affected. More losses than gains were detected, but there were no significant differences between the numbers of changes seen in each category. Each individual sample revealed unique changes, additional to those shared within each case. The most frequently observed gains were of X and 12q. The most common losses were of 8p, 16p, 9p, 15q, 18q, and 10q. Nominally significant associations were observed between metastatic tumor and loss of 12q24.1 or 10p13-14, non-metastatic tumor and loss of 8q24.1, tumor extending to serosal fat and loss of 6q24-25 or gain of 4q11-13, tumor extending to serosal fat and metastatic lesions and loss of 4q32-34 or 22q11-12, and adenoma and loss of 15q24. Loss of 4q32-34 remained highly significant after correction for multiple testing. Adenoma was the only category not to show loss of 17p. These data reveal a genetically heterogeneous picture of tumor progression, with a small number of changes associated with advanced disease. (C) 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available