Journal
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages 425-427Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2003.tb00421.x
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objective: To assess the extent to which Indigenous status confounds the association between remoteness and neonatal mortality in Queensland. Methods: We used routine data from the Queensland Perinatal Data Collection. Poisson regression modelling was used to assess confounding. Results: Babies born to Indigenous mothers have mortality rates 2.42 times those of the rest of the population, regardless of whether they live in urban, rural or remote areas (95% CI 2.09-2.80). The babies of non-Indigenous women who live in remote areas have a low risk of neonatal death, similar to their rural and urban counterparts. Conclusion: In Queensland, the key demographic variable that determines neonatal mortality is Indigenous status, not remoteness. Implications: Policymakers should not assume that an excess of a particular health problem in remote areas necessarily reflects equal disadvantage for all the Australians who live there.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available