4.5 Article

Resistance of the pulmonary epithelium to movement of buffer ions

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajplung.00398.2002

Keywords

air space acidification; intracellular pH; ammonium; bicarbonate; acetate

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-60057] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCD NIH HHS [DC-03191] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Exposure of the apical surfaces of alveolar monolayers to acidic and alkaline solutions has been reported to have little influence on intracellular pH compared with basolateral challenges (Joseph D, Tirmizi O, Zhang X, Crandall ED, and Lubman RL. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 282: L675-L683, 2002). We have used fluorescent pH indicators and a trifurcated optical bundle to determine whether the apical surfaces are less permeable to ionized buffers than the membranes that separate the vasculature from the tissues in intact rat lungs. In the first set of experiments, the air spaces were filled with perfusate containing FITC-dextran (mol wt 60,000) or 2',7'-bis(2-carboxyethyl)-5(6)-carboxyfluorescein (BCECF). Air space pH fell progressively from 7.4 to 6.61 +/- 0.03 (mean +/- SE, n = 11, air space buffers at 10 mM). Perfusion for 2 min with 2 mM NH4Cl increased air space pH by 0.142 +/- 0.019 unit, without a subsequent acidic overshoot. Infusions of NaHCO3 and sodium acetate reduced pH without a subsequent alkaline overshoot. In the second set of experiments, cellular pH was monitored in air-filled lungs after perfusion with BCECF-AM. Injections of NH4Cl caused a biphasic response, with initial alkalinization of the cellular compartment followed by acidification after the NH4Cl was washed from the lungs. Subsequent return of pH to normal was slowed by infusions of 1.0 mM dimethyl amiloride. These studies suggest that lung cells are protected from air space acidification by the impermeability of the apical membranes to buffer ions and that the cells extrude excess H+ through basolateral Na+/H+ exchangers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available