4.6 Article

Human ZIP1 is a major zinc uptake transporter for the accumulation of zinc in prostate cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF INORGANIC BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 96, Issue 2-3, Pages 435-442

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0162-0134(03)00249-6

Keywords

zinc; zinc transporter; prostate cells; ZIP transporter

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA79903, R01 CA079903] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The prostate gland of humans and other animals accumulates a level of zinc that is 3-10 times greater than that found in other tissues. Associated with this ability to accumulate zinc is a rapid zinc uptake process in human prostate cells, which we previously identified as the hZIP1 zinc transporter. We now provide additional evidence that hZIP1 is an important operational transporter that allows for the transport and accumulation of zinc. The studies reveal that hZIP1 (SLC39A1) but not hZIP2 (SLC39A2) is expressed in the zinc-accumulating human prostate cell lines, LNCaP and PC-3. Transfected PC-3 cells that overexpress hZIP1 exhibit increased uptake and accumulation of zinc. The V-max for zinc uptake was increased with no change in K-m,. Along with the increased intracellular accumulation of zinc, the overexpression of hZIPI also results in the inhibition of growth of PC-3 cells. Down-regulation of hZIPI by treatment of PC-3 cells with hZIPI antisense oligonucleotide resulted in a decreased zinc uptake. Uptake of zinc from zinc chelated with citrate was as rapid as from free zinc ions; however, the cells did not take up zinc chelated with EDTA. The cellular uptake of zinc is not dependent upon an available pool of free Zn2+ ions. Instead, the mechanism of transport appears to involve the transport of zinc from low molecular weight ligands that exist in circulation as relatively loosely bound complexes with zinc. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available