4.1 Article

Alignment of trans-tibial prostheses based on roll-over shape principles

Journal

PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 89-99

Publisher

INT SOC PROSTHET ORTHOTICS
DOI: 10.1080/03093640308726664

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The authors examined the roll-over shape alignment hypothesis, which states that prosthetic feet are aligned by matching their roll-over shapes with an ideal shape. The ideal shape was considered to be the roll-over shape of the able-bodied foot-ankle system. An alignment algorithm and computational alignment system were developed to set transtibial alignments based on this hypothesis. Three prosthetic feet with considerably different roll-over shapes were either aligned using the alignment system or not aligned (i.e. used previous foot's alignment), and then were aligned by a team of prosthetists. No significant differences were found between roll-over shapes aligned by the computational alignment system and those based on standard clinical techniques (p = 0.944). Significant differences were found between the no alignment shapes and the prosthetist alignment shapes (p = 0.006), and between the no alignment shapes and the computational alignment system shapes (p = 0.024). The results of the experiment support the hypothesis that the goal of alignment is to match the prosthetic foot's roll-over shape, as closely as possible, with an ideal shape. The hypothesis is also supported by its ability to explain the results of previous studies. Using an ideal roll-over shape or surface as a goal for prosthetic alignment could lead to a priori alignment, eliminating the need for alignment hardware in some cases. Being able to build the alignment into a prosthesis without special hardware could be beneficial in low-income countries and in the fabrication of lightweight prostheses for the elderly.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available