4.3 Article

Angiotensin-I-converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism and high urinary albumin concentration in French Type 2 diabetes patients

Journal

DIABETIC MEDICINE
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages 677-682

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.01024.x

Keywords

angiotensin-converting enzyme; diabetic nephropathy; genetics; Type 2 diabetes; urinary albumin excretion rate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims Family-based studies suggest a genetic basis for nephropathy in Type 2 diabetes. The angiotensin-I-converting enzyme (ACE) gene is a candidate gene for Type 1 diabetes nephropathy. We assessed the association between high urinary albumin concentration and ACE insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism, in French Type 2 diabetes patients. Methods We studied 3139 micro/macroalbuminuric French patients recruited in the DIABHYCAR Study, an ACE inhibition trial in Type 2 diabetes patients with renal and cardiovascular outcomes. The main inclusion criteria were age greater than or equal to 50 years, urinary albumin concentration greater than or equal to 20 mg/l assessed centrally during two consecutive screening visits, and plasma creatinine concentration less than or equal to 150 mumol/l. These patients were compared with 605 normoalbuminuric (NA; urinary albumin concentration < 10 mg/l at first screening for the DIABHYCAR Study) French patients. ACE I/D genotype was determined by nested polymerase chain reaction. Results The ACE I/D polymorphism was in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The distribution of genotypes did not differ significantly between micro/macroalbuminuric and NA patients: 552 and 115 II, 1468 and 282 ID, 1119 and 208 DD (P = 0.67). However, the ACE D allele was more frequent among normotensive micro/macroalbuminuric patients than among NA patients (P = 0.039). Conclusions The ACE I/D polymorphism was not associated with high urinary albumin concentration in French Type 2 diabetes patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available