4.6 Article

Structural comparison of human monoamine oxidases A and B -: Mass spectrometry monitoring of cysteine reactivities

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 278, Issue 31, Pages 28612-28618

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M303712200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [NCRR-12878, NCRR-13948, NCRR-02878] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM-29433] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Monoamine oxidases (MAO) A and B are similar to60-kDa outer mitochondrial membrane flavoenzymes catalyzing the degradation of neurotransmitters and xenobiotic arylalkyl amines. Despite 70% identity of their amino acid sequences, both enzymes exhibit strikingly different properties when exposed to thiol-modifying reagents. Human MAO A and MAO B each contain 9 cysteine residues (7 in conserved sequence locations). MAO A is inactivated by N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) much faster (tau(1/2) = similar to3 min) than MAO B (tau(1/2) = similar to8 h). These differences in thiol reactivities are also demonstrated by monitoring the NEM modification stoichiometries by electrospray mass spectrometry. Inactivation of either enzyme with acetylenic inhibitors results in alterations of their thiol reactivities. Cys(5) and Cys(266) were identified as the only residues modified by biotin-derivatized NEM in clorgyline-inactivated MAO A and pargyline-nactivated MAO B, respectively. The x-ray structure of MAO B (Binda, C., Newton-Vinson, P., Hubalek, F., Edmondson, D. E., and Mattevi, A. (2002) Nat. Struct. Biol. 9, 22-26) shows that Cys(5) is located on the surface of the molecule opposite to the membrane-binding region. Cys(266) in MAO A is predicted to be located in the same region of the molecule. These thiol residues are also modified by biotin-derivatized NEM in the mitochondrial membrane-bound MAO A and MAO B. This study shows that the MAO A structure is more flexible than that of MAO B and that clorgyline and pargyline inactivation of MAO A and B, respectively, increases the structural stability of both enzymes. No evidence is found for the presence of disulfide bonds in either enzyme, contrary to a previous suggestion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available