4.6 Article

A new staging system for multiple myeloma patients based on the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) experience

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 122, Issue 3, Pages 441-450

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04456.x

Keywords

beta 2 microglobulin; multiple myeloma; staging

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We aimed to develop and evaluate a staging system for multiple myeloma (MM) based on easily obtained laboratory measures. The Durie-Salmon stage is most commonly used and is an effective system of patient stratification for clinical trial research. However, the criteria are complex and many laboratory parameters are required to properly stage patients. In this analysis, we focused on two common measures with prognostic importance in MM: serum beta2 microglobulin (beta2m) and serum albumin. Pre-study data on 1555 previously untreated MM patients enrolled on four recent South-west Oncology Group (SWOG) phase III trials were used in the analysis. Staging models were developed and validated using regression tree methods for survival outcomes. SWOG stages were defined as: stage 1, beta2m < 2.5 mg/l (14% of patients, median overall survival of 55 months); stage 2, 2.5 less than or equal to beta2m < 5.5 (43% of patients, median overall survival of 40 months); stage 3, beta2m greater than or equal to 5.5 and albumin greater than or equal to 30 g/l (32% of patients, median overall survival of 24 months); and stage 4, beta2m greater than or equal to 5.5 and albumin < 30 g/l (11% of patients and median overall survival of 16 months). This staging scheme was also predictive of event-free survival, first-year mortality and long-term (greater than or equal to 5 years) event-free survival. We conclude that although the SWOG stage does not represent a new prognostic marker for MM (cytogenetics, FISH), it could provide a simple alternative to the Durie-Salmon stage for patients with previously untreated MM. Additional evaluation in other MM patient populations is needed to confirm results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available