4.7 Article

Interaction of oxidative stress and inflammatory response in coronary plaque instability - Important role of C-reactive protein

Journal

ARTERIOSCLEROSIS THROMBOSIS AND VASCULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages 1398-1404

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000081637.36475.BC

Keywords

C-reactive protein; inflammation; oxidative stress; free radicals; coronary artery diseases

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective - C-reactive protein (CRP), a predictor of cardiovascular events, localizes in atherosclerotic arteries and exerts proinflammatory effects on vascular cells. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been implicated in atherogenesis and plaque instability. Methods and Results - Expressional pattern of CRP in directional coronary atherectomy specimens from 39 patients was examined. Characteristics of histological plaque instability and higher levels of serum CRP and fibrinogen were associated with the CRP immunoreactivity. In situ hybridization revealed the presence of CRP mRNA in coronary vasculature. Furthermore, the expression of CRP mRNA and protein was detected in cultured human coronary artery smooth muscle cells (CASMCs) by reverse transcriptase - polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting. In addition, CRP was frequently colocalized with p22(phox), an essential component of NADH/NADPH oxidase, which is an important source of ROS in vasculature. Moreover, the incubation of cultured CASMCs with CRP resulted in the enhanced p22phox protein expression and in the generation of intracellular ROS. Conclusions - The expression of CRP in coronary arteries was associated with histological and clinical features of vulnerable plaque, and it had a prooxidative effect on cultured CASMCs, suggesting that it might play a crucial role in plaque instability and in the pathogenesis of acute coronary syndrome via its prooxidative effect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available