4.8 Article

The effect of temperature fluctuations on psychrophilic anaerobic sequencing batch reactors treating swine manure

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 89, Issue 1, Pages 57-62

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00009-9

Keywords

manure treatment; psychrophilic anaerobic digestion; sequencing batch reactors; swine manure; temperature

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Under northern climatic conditions, a temporary decrease in the temperature of anaerobic reactors treating swine manure is likely to happen at the farm. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of temperature fluctuations, between 10 and 20 degreesC, on the stability and performance of psychrophilic anaerobic sequencing batch reactors (ASBRs) treating swine. manure. Methane yield decreased from 0.266 +/- 0.014 l/g of total chemical oxygen demand (TCOD) fed to the ASBRs at 20 degreesC to 0.218 +/- 0.022 and 0.080 +/- 0.002 l/g TCODfed at 15 and 10 degreesC, respectively. Soluble chemical oxygen, demand (SCOD) reduction decreased from 94.2 +/- 1.1% at 20 degreesC to 78.8 +/- 3.0% at 15 degreesC and 60.4 +/- 6.4% at 10 degreesC. Total COD removal also tended to decrease as temperature was lowered, but difference between operating temperatures was not as pronounced. A lower methanogenic activity in the ASBRs operated at 10 degreesC probably favoured quiescent conditions during the settling period, thereby increasing physical removal of the TCOD through sedimentation of the solids with the biomass. When the operating temperature was increased back to 15 and 20 degreesC, methane yield and SCOD reduction improved, but reactor performance remained significantly (P < 0.05) lower than that achieved before the cycles at 10 degreesC. Results from this experiment nevertheless suggested that fluctuation in the operating temperature of psychrophilic ASBRs should only have temporary effects on the performance and stability of the process. Crown Copyright (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available