4.5 Article

Pharmacokinetic model to describe the lymphatic absorption of r-metHu-Leptin after subcutaneous injection to sheep

Journal

PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages 1156-1162

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1023/A:1025036611949

Keywords

leptin; lymph; protein delivery; subcutaneous; pharmacokinetic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose. The purpose of this work was to develop a pharmacokinetic model to describe the contribution of the lymphatics to the absorption and bioavailability of r-metHu-Leptin administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection to sheep. Methods. r-metHu-Leptin was administered either by bolus intravenous injection (0.1 mg/kg) into the jugular vein or by SC injection (0.15 mg/kg) into the interdigital space of the hind leg. The SC groups included a non-cannulated control group and a lymph-cannulated group, in which peripheral lymph was continuously collected from a cannula in the efferent popliteal lymph duct. Serum and lymph concentrations were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and profiles were modeled using compartmental pharmacokinetic methods. The fraction of the dose reaching the systemic circulation (F-sys) and the proportions of the absorbed dose taken up via the blood (F-blood) and lymph (F-lymph) were determined. Results. Serum and lymph concentration vs. time profiles were well described by a two compartment model with parallel first order absorption into blood and lymph. F-sys for the SC control group was 60.4 +/- 8.4%. In the lymph-cannulated group, 21.7 +/- 6.4% of the dose was recovered in serum and 34.4 +/- 9.7% was recovered in peripheral lymph giving a total fraction absorbed (F-abs) of 56.0 +/- 10.3%. F-sys for the SC control group was not significantly different to Fabs in the lymph-cannulated group. Conclusion. This study has shown that the lymph represents the predominant pathway for absorption of r-metHu-Leptin after SC administration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available