Journal
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
Volume 95, Issue 8, Pages 1585-1593Publisher
W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.01.033
Keywords
Rehabilitation
Categories
Funding
- Project of Shanghai City Health System Excellent Discipline Leader Training [XBR2013104]
- Construction of The National Five Years' Major Drug Discovery Projects-Chinese Medicine (malignant tumor disease) Clinical Evaluation [2011ZX09302-006-04]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objective: To assess the efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) and provide clinicians with an evidence base for their clinical decision making. Data Sources: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews. Study Selection: All randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials of ESWT for chronic recalcitrant plantar fasciitis were searched. Searching identified 108 potentially relevant articles.; of these, 7 studies with 550 participants met inclusion criteria. Data Extraction: Number of patients, population, body mass index, duration of symptoms, adverse effects, blinding method, and details of shockwave therapy were extracted. Data Synthesis: For intervention success rate, ESWT of low intensity was more effective than control treatment of low intensity. For pain relief, the pooled data showed a significant difference between the ESWT and control groups. For function, only low-intensity ESWT was significantly superior over the control treatment. Conclusions: The efficacy of low-intensity ESWT is worthy of recognition. The short-term pain relief and functional outcomes of this treatment are satisfactory. However, owing to the lack of a long-term follow-up, its long-term efficacy remains unknown. (C) 2014 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available