4.7 Article

Learning, cognitive, and attentional problems in adolescents born small for gestational age

Journal

PEDIATRICS
Volume 112, Issue 2, Pages 301-307

Publisher

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.112.2.301

Keywords

learning difficulties; cognition; attention; small for gestational age; symmetry

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. To determine whether the presence, severity, or symmetry of growth restriction in term infants is an independent risk factor for learning, cognitive, and attentional problems in adolescence. Methods. A total of 7388 term infants have been followed prospectively since birth. At 14 years, 5059 mothers completed a Child Behavior Checklist and provided information on their child's school progress. A total of 5051 adolescents completed a Youth Self Report, with 3703 also undergoing psychometric testing with Ravens Progressive Matrices and Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT) reading subtest. Outcomes were compared on the basis of birth weight groups and measures of body symmetry and were adjusted for the level of social risk at birth. Results. Adolescents who were born small for gestational age (SGA), when compared with their appropriately grown counterparts (> 10th percentile), were more likely to experience learning difficulties, with a higher prevalence in those of birth weight less than or equal to3rd percentile. Girls of birth weight less than or equal to3rd percentile were more likely to have attentional problems and low WRAT reading scores. There was no significant difference in Ravens IQ or mean WRAT reading scores between SGA and non-SGA groups. There was no association between body symmetry and any of the outcomes studied. Conclusions. SGA status seems to have only modest independent effects on learning, cognition, and attention in adolescence. Severity but not symmetry of growth restriction predicted learning difficulties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available