4.5 Article

Development of new high strength Al-Sc filler wires for fusion welding 7000 series aluminium aerospace alloys

Journal

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF WELDING AND JOINING
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages 235-245

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1179/136217103225010989

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It has been reported that the transition metal scandium (Sc) can improve the weldability and mechanical properties of aluminium aerospace alloys that are normally considered to he 'unweldable'. However, little is currently known about the mechanisms by which Sc leads to such improvements. Here, the effect of the Sc concentration ill the fusion zone of metal inert gas (MIG) welds in a typical 7000 series Aerospace alloy, has been investigated in detail. It was found that at a critical Sc level (similar to0.4 wt-%) a dramatic level of grain refinement occurs, leading to a highly uniform, ultrafine (similar to 10mum) grain structure across the entire the fusion zone. Grain refinement was accompanied by all increase in the concentration of solute that was retained ill solid solution after solidification, which led to a reduction in the volume fraction of eutectic per unit grain boundary area, and a significant age hardening response in the fusion zone. The tensile properties of Single pass MIG welds, produced with an Al-Sc filler. wire, were compared to welds made using commercial Al filler wires recommended for welding 7000 series alloys (5087, 5180, and 5039). The Sc containing filler wire greatly outperformed all the commercial filler. wires, both in terms of weld strength and ductility. Further improvements in the tensile properties of the welds were achieved by exploiting the enhanced aging response of the Al- Sc filler wires, through welding in a Solution heat treated condition and using a post-weld aging treatment. The underlying metallurgical processes by which Sc brings about these improvements are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available