4.7 Article

Front-face fluorescence spectroscopy and chemometrics in analysis of yogurt: Rapid analysis of riboflavin

Journal

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE
Volume 86, Issue 8, Pages 2508-2515

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73845-4

Keywords

fluorescence spectroscopy; chemometrics; riboflavin; yogurt; light-induced oxidation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study demonstrates the use of front-face fluorescence spectroscopy and chemometrics for monitoring light-induced changes in plain yogurt during storage. Fluorescence analysis is suggested as a new rapid method for measuring riboflavin content in yogurt. Fluorescence landscapes with excitation wavelengths from 270 to 550 nm and emission wavelengths in the range 310 to 590 nm were obtained from front-face fluorescence measurements directly on yogurt samples during two storage experiments over a period of 5wk at 4degreesC. Yogurts were stored in two different packaging materials (polylactate and polystyrene) and under fluorescent light (3500 lux) or in darkness. Principal Component Analysis of unfolded fluorescence emission spectra revealed systematic changes in fluorescence signal throughout the storage period, strongly related to the storage conditions, i.e. storage time and differences in packaging materials. Correlation between fluorescence spectra and riboflavin content determined by the standard AOAC fluorometric method was evaluated using a Partial Least Square Regression model. The regression model showed a good ability to predict riboflavin in plain yogurt with a high correlation (R = 0.99) and a prediction error of 0.092 mug riboflavin/g. Thus, it is concluded that nondestructive fluorescence spectroscopy can be used to monitor riboflavin content in yogurt, and that the suggested rapid method has the potential to substitute the standard method for analysis of riboflavin in yogurt.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available