4.6 Article

Hybrid Functional Electrical Stimulation Exercise Training Alters the Relationship Between Spinal Cord Injury Level and Aerobic Capacity

Journal

ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
Volume 95, Issue 11, Pages 2172-2179

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.07.412

Keywords

Exercise; Rehabilitation

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL117037, R01HL117037] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To test the hypothesis that hybrid functional electrical stimulation (PIES) row training would improve aerobic capacity but that it would remain strongly linked to level of spinal cord lesion because of limited maximal ventilation. Design: Longitudinal before after trial of 6 months of FES row training. Setting: Exercise for persons with disabilities program in a hospitaL. Participants: Volunteers (N=14; age range, 21-63y) with complete spinal cord injury (SCI) (T3-11) who are >2 years postinjury. Intervention: Six months of PIES row training preceded by a variable period of PIES strength training. Main Outcome Measures: Peak aerobic capacity and peak exercise ventilation before and after 6 months of PIES row training. Results: FES row training significantly increased peak aerobic capacity and peak minute ventilation (both P<.05). Prior to PIES row training, there was a close relation between level of SCI and peak aerobic capacity (adjusted R-2=.40, P=.009) that was markedly reduced after PIES row training (adjusted R-2=.15, P=.10). In contrast, the relation between level of injury and peak minute ventilation was comparable before and after PIES row training (adjusted R-2=.38 vs .32, both P<.05). Conclusions: The increased aerobic capacity reflects more than increased ventilation; FES row training effectively circumvents the effect of SCI on peak aerobic capacity by engaging more muscle mass for training, independent of the level of injury. (C) 2014 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available