4.5 Article

Experimental evidence against the mitochondrial theory of aging -: A study of isolated human skeletal muscle mitochondria

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL GERONTOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 8, Pages 877-886

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0531-5565(03)00092-5

Keywords

age effects; ATP formation; BSA effects; collagen content; cytochromes; low temperature spectroscopy; oxygen uptakes; quadriceps muscle; respiration; specific enzyme activities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mitochondrial theory of aging was tested with optimised preparation techniques. Mitochondria were isolated from similar to90 mg quadriceps muscle from healthy humans at age 70+ and 20+ The content of mitochondrial protein was similar to10 mg g(-1) muscle and the yields were similar to40%. The mitochondrial integrity was high as judged from the respiratory control and P/O ratios. No general membrane alterations or changes in the cytochrome contents were observed. BSA decreased the non-phosphorylating rates of respiration equally in both age groups. Thirteen different enzyme activities were assayed and normalised to protein content and citrate synthase activity. Most of the critical levels for detection of declines were < 10%. In the 70+ group, the activity for fatty acid oxidation was decreased by similar to20%. Two inherently low activities associated with oxidation of sarcoplasmic NADH were also decreased, probably related to the age change of fibre types. The remaining activities measured, e.g. those of pyruvate dehydrogenase, tricarboxylic acid cycle, respiratory chain, and ATP synthesis, were not observed to be lowered. Thus, the central bioenergetic systems appeared unaltered with age. The obvious discord with reported age declines of human skeletal muscle mitochondrial function is discussed. It is concluded that the present results are incompatible with the mitochondrial theory of aging. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available