4.7 Article

Distal motor latency and residual latency as sensitive markers of anti-MAG polyneuropathy

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 250, Issue 8, Pages 962-966

Publisher

DR DIETRICH STEINKOPFF VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-003-1128-7

Keywords

chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy; anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein polyneuropathy; distal motor latency; terminal latency index; residual latency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is debate whether the terminal latency index (TLI) is a sensitive marker for polyneuropathy with anti-myelin-associated-glycoprotein antibodies (anti-MAGP). We examined 6 patients with an anti-MAGP and 6 patients with a chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). The electroneurographic features studied were: distal compound motor action potential (CMAP), distal motor latency (DML), motor conduction velocity (MCV) elbow to wrist (distal MCV), MCV axilla to elbow (proximal MCV), MCV distal/proximal, terminal latency index (TLI), residual latency (RL), F-wave, and modified F ratio. We found significant differences between anti-MAGP and CIDP for DML and for RL. No significant differences were found for TLI and the other measures. The TLI values were not significant probably because our patients had a longer duration of disease, which supports the hypothesis of a distal to proximal progression of conduction slowing over time. We propose that a residual latency > 4.0 and a distal motor latency > 7.0 are strongly suggestive for an anti-MAGP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available