4.6 Article

Effects of Stimulating Hip and Trunk Muscles on Seated Stability, Posture, and Reach After Spinal Cord Injury

Journal

ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
Volume 94, Issue 9, Pages 1766-1775

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.02.023

Keywords

Electrical stimulation; Neural prostheses; Posture; Rehabilitation; Spinal cord injuries; Torso

Funding

  1. Rehabilitation Research & Development Service of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs [B6406R]
  2. Spinal Cord Injury Research Program at the U.S. Department of Defense [SC090230]
  3. CDMRP [SC090230, 547209] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine the stimulated strength of the paralyzed gluteal and paraspinal muscles and their effects on the seated function of individuals with paralysis. Design: Case series with subjects acting as their own concurrent controls. Setting: Hospital-based clinical biomechanics laboratory. Participants: Users (N=8) of implanted neuroprostheses for lower extremity function with low-cervical or thoracic level injuries. Interventions: Dynamometry and digital motion capture both with and without stimulation to the hip and trunk muscles. Main Outcome Measures: Isometric trunk extension moment at 0 degrees, 15 degrees, and 30 degrees of flexion; seated stability in terms of simulated isokinetic rowing; pelvic tilt, shoulder height, loaded and unloaded bimanual reaching to different heights, and subjective ratings of difficulty during unsupported sitting. Results: Stimulation produced significant increases in mean trunk extension moment (9.2 +/- 9.5Nm, P<.001) and rowing force (27.4 +/- 23.1N, P<.012) over baseline volitional values. Similarly, stimulation induced positive changes in average pelvic tilt (16.7 +/- 15.7 degrees) and shoulder height (2.2 +/- 2.5cm) during quiet sitting and bimanual reaching, and increased mean reach distance (5.5 +/- 6.6cm) over all subjects, target heights, and loading conditions. Subjects consistently rated tasks with stimulation easier than voluntary effort alone. Conclusions: In spite of considerable intersubject variability, stabilizing the paralyzed trunk with electrical stimulation can positively impact seated posture, extend forward reach, and allow exertion of larger forces on objects in the environment. (C) 2013 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available