4.6 Article

Development and Evaluation of the Activities Measure for Upper Limb Amputees

Journal

ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
Volume 94, Issue 3, Pages 488-494

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.10.004

Keywords

Amputation; Disability evaluation; Psychometrics; Rehabilitation; Upper extremity

Funding

  1. Office of Research and Development Rehabilitation Research and Development Service, Department of Veterans Affairs [A6780I]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: (1) To develop a measure of activities for adults with upper limb amputation: the Activities Measure for Upper Limb Amputees (AM-ULA); and (2) to conduct initial psychometric evaluation of the measure. Design: This was a cohort study where the prototype measure was administered twice within 1 week. Tests were videotaped and graded by 2 independent raters. Interrater reliability, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and minimal detectable change were estimated. Known group validity was examined using analyses of variance comparing scores of transradial, transhumeral, and shoulder level amputees. Convergent validity was examined by correlating AM-ULA scores with dexterity tests and self-reported function. Setting: Hospital outpatient. Participants: Subjects (N = 52) with upper limb amputation. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Not applicable. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for test-retest reliability were .88 to .91. ICCs for interraterreliability were .84 to .89. Cronbach alphas were .89 to .91. The minimal detectable change at the 90% confidence interval was 3.7 points. Subjects with more distal levels of limb loss had better scores than those with more proximal levels (P<.01). The AM-ULA was moderately correlated with most dexterity tests and self-reported function. Conclusions: The AM-ULA is a new measure of activity performance for adults with upper limb amputation that considers task completion, speed, movement quality, skillfulness of prosthetic use, and independence in its rating system. It has good interrater reliability, test-retest reliability, and demonstrated known group validity. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2013;94:488-94 (C) 2013 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available