4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

A technique for measuring two-phase relative permeability in porous media via X-ray CT measurements

Journal

JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
Volume 39, Issue 1-2, Pages 159-174

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0920-4105(03)00046-9

Keywords

imbibition; relative permeability; capillarity; X-ray tomography; laboratory studies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel method for computing two-phase relative permeability curves from the results of spontaneous imbibition experiments is presented. Using a specially constructed imbibition cell and an X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) scanner, we obtain accurate measurement of saturation profiles along the length of cores as a function of time. The saturation profile history allows direct computation of the relative permeability for both phases from a single experiment when used in combination with a previously measured capillary pressure curve. Results are unique within experimental error. The proposed procedure works equally well for spontaneous and forced cocurrent imbibition. It was tested thoroughly using synthetic and experimental spontaneous imbibition data, for water-air and water-oil systems. Study showed that the pressure-gradient history can be neglected during calculations of air-water relative permeability; however, pressure-gradient data improves the accuracy of measurement for viscous oil flowing at high water saturation. Test results are described within the paper. Advantages include the incorporation of capillary forces and no requirement for steady-state conditions. This method is useful to measure imbibition relative permeability curves, especially in low permeability rocks at relatively low wetting phase saturations. In such systems, it is laborious to reach multiple steady states and capillary forces are significant so that classical unsteady-state techniques do not apply. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available