4.6 Article

Effects of Intramuscular Trunk Stimulation on Manual Wheelchair Propulsion Mechanics in 6 Subjects With Spinal Cord Injury

Journal

ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
Volume 94, Issue 10, Pages 1997-2005

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.04.010

Keywords

Electrical stimulation; Neural prostheses; Posture; Rehabilitation; Spinal cord injuries; Torso

Funding

  1. Merit Review from the Rehabilitation Research & Development Service of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs [B6406R]
  2. SCI Research Program of the U.S. Department of Defense [SC090230]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To quantify the effects of stabilizing the paralyzed trunk and pelvis with electrical stimulation on manual wheelchair propulsion. Design: Single-subject design case series with subjects acting as their own concurrent controls. Setting: Hospital-based clinical biomechanics laboratory. Participants: Individuals (N=6; 4 men, 2 women; mean age +/- SD, 46 +/- 10.8y) who were long-time users (6.1 +/- 3.9y) of implanted neuroprostheses for lower extremity function and had chronic (8.6 +/- 2.8y) midcervical- or thoracic-level injuries (C6-T10). Interventions: Continuous low-level stimulation to the hip (gluteus maximus, posterior adductor, or hamstrings) and trunk extensor (lumbar erector spinae and/or quadratus lumborum) muscles with implanted intramuscular electrodes. Main Outcome Measures: Pushrim kinetics (peak resultant force, fraction effective force), kinematics (cadence, stroke length, maximum forward lean), and peak shoulder moment at preferred speed over 10-m level surface; speed, pushrim kinetics, and subjective ratings of effort for level 100-m sprints and up a 30.5-m ramp of approximately 5% grade. Results: Three of 5 subjects demonstrated reduced peak resultant pushrim forces (P <=.014) and improved efficiency (P <=.048) with stimulation during, self-paced level propulsion. Peak sagittal shoulder moment remained unchanged in 3 subjects and increased in 2 others (P<001). Maximal forward trunk lean also increased by 19% to 26% (P<.001) with stimulation in these 3 subjects. Stroke lengths were unchanged by stimulation in all subjects, and 2 showed extremely small (5%) but statistically significant increases in cadence (P <=.021). Performance measures for sprints and inclines were generally unchanged with stimulation; however, subjects consistently rated propulsion with stimulation to be easier for both surfaces. Conclusions: Stabilizing the pelvis and trunk with low levels of continuous electrical stimulation to the lumbar trunk and hip extensors can positively impact the mechanics of manual wheelchair propulsion and reduce both perceived and physical measures of effort. (c) 2013 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available