4.5 Article

Mycobacterium vaccae administration during allergen sensitization or challenge suppresses asthmatic features

Journal

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY
Volume 33, Issue 8, Pages 1083-1089

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2003.01727.x

Keywords

airway hyper-responsiveness; allergy; asthma; eosinophilia; lung; Mycobacterium vaccae; Th1; Th2 cells

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and objective The hygiene hypothesis suggests that a lack of bacterial infections would favour the development of allergic disease. For this reason, bacteria or their components can be used as potential treatment for allergic asthma. We investigated whether heat-killed Mycobacterium vaccae is either able to suppress the induction of allergic asthma or able to suppress already established allergic asthma. Methods Mice were sensitized with ovalbumin (OVA)/alum on days 0 and 14. Thereafter, mice were challenged on days 35, 39 and 42 by inhalation of either OVA or saline aerosols. M. vaccae -treated mice received an injection with 10(6), 10(7) or 10(8) CFU heat-killed M. vaccae on days 0 and 14 or 10(7) CFU on days 35 and 39. On day 43, the airway responsiveness of the mice to increasing concentrations of methacholine was assessed, blood was withdrawn to measure serum parameters, and lung lavage was performed to detect cytokines and inflammatory cell number. Results Treatment of OVA-sensitized mice with 10(7) CFU M. vaccae either during sensitization or challenge suppresses airway hyper-responsiveness, airway eosinophilia and IL-5 production after OVA challenge. The increases in OVA-specific serum IgE and in IL-4 by respiratory challenges with OVA were only diminished after M. vaccae treatment (10(7) CFU) during sensitization. Conclusions Heat-killed M. vaccae prevents allergic and asthmatic manifestations in a mouse model and, more importantly, M. vaccae treatment during challenge suppresses features of asthma, which opens up possibilities for new therapeutic interventions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available