4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

The factors controlling the engineering properties of bentonite-enhanced sand

Journal

APPLIED CLAY SCIENCE
Volume 23, Issue 1-4, Pages 97-110

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-1317(03)00092-9

Keywords

barriers; bentonite; geotechnical engineering; hydraulic conductivity; landfill; sand

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper considers the engineering behaviour of bentonite-enhanced sand (BES) mixtures in relation to their performance as environmental barriers. Data on the swelling and hydraulic conductivity are presented. At low effective stresses the bentonite within BES mixtures swells sufficiently to separate the sand particles. In such states two factors affect the void ratio reached by the bentonite after swelling: the ionic concentration of the pore solution and the bentonite fabric after compaction. Bentonite swelling is very sensitive to the pore solution concentration because increasing concentration suppresses the diffuse double layer component of swelling. Remoulding during compaction can result in a slight reduction in bentonite swelling, probably because of disruption to the cluster-based fabric of bentonite. At high effective stresses the bentonite has insufficient swelling capacity to force the sand particles apart, and the sand pore volume thus limits swelling. A model to predict the swelling and hydraulic conductivity of BES in distilled water and various salt solutions is described. This model requires the swelling behaviour and hydraulic conductivity of the bentonite in the relevant solution, and the compressibility and porosity of the sand component as input parameters. Soil tortuosity is used as a fitting parameter, and is estimated from Archie's equation. Application of this model to the swelling of compacted mixtures is shown to produce a good fit with the experimental data. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available