4.7 Article

Right hemidiaphragmatic mobility: Assessment with US measurement of craniocaudal displacement of left branches of portal vein

Journal

RADIOLOGY
Volume 228, Issue 2, Pages 389-394

Publisher

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2282011554

Keywords

diaphragm; hepatic veins, US; liver, US; ultrasound (US), physics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE: To evaluate the correlation and agreement between ultrasonographic 1 (US) measurement of craniocaudal displacement of the left intrahepatic branches of the portal vein and radiographic measurement of right hemidiaphragmatic mobility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients with indications for abdominal angiography or percutaneous cholangiography prospectively underwent radio-graphic evaluation of right hemidiaphragmatic mobility and B-mode US measurement of craniocaudal displacement of the left intrahepatic branches of the portal vein. US was performed by using a 3.5-MHz convex transducer in a right subcostal position with a longitudinal orientation. Statistical analyses were performed by using linear regression, paired Student t test, and Bland-Altman analyses. RESULTS: The correlation between the US and radiographic measurements was found to be linear: hemidiaphragmatic mobility = (-1.562 + 1.032) X portal vein branch displacement (r = 0.651, P < .001). The mean craniocaudal displacement of the intrahepatic branches of the portal vein measured at US was 35.2 mm +/- 10.7 (SD). The mean right hemidiaphragmatic mobility measured at radiography was 34.8 mm +/- 17.0. The mean difference between the two measurements was not statistically significant (0.4 mm +/- 12.9, P = .807). CONCLUSION: US measurement of craniocaudal displacement of the left intrahepatic branches of the portal vein can be used for indirect assessment of right hemidiaphragmatic mobility. (C) RSNA, 2003.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available