4.7 Article

Ovarian modulators of type 1 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (11βHSD) activity and intra-follicular cortisol:cortisone ratios correlate with the clinical outcome of IVF

Journal

HUMAN REPRODUCTION
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages 1603-1612

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deg322

Keywords

11 beta HSD; cortisol; cortisone; hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase; IVF

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Follicular fluid (FF) contains compounds that can modulate NADP(+)-dependent oxidation of cortisol by type 1 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (11betaHSD). The objective of this study was to investigate the relationships between levels of the ovarian modulators of type 1 11betaHSD, intra-follicular cortisol:cortisone ratios and the clinical outcome of IVF cycles. METHODS: A single random sample of FF was aspirated from each of 132 patients undergoing gonadotrophin-stimulated IVF. Components of FF, resolved using C18 column chromatography, were evaluated for effects on NADP(+)-dependent cortisol oxidation in rat kidney homogenates. Intra- follicular steroid concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassays. Clinical pregnancies were confirmed by ultrasonography at 6 weeks post-embryo transfer. RESULTS: Levels of the hydrophilic ovarian 11betaHSD stimuli were significantly lower (P < 0.0001) and levels of the hydrophobic ovarian 11 beta HSD inhibitors were significantly higher (P < 0.002) in conception versus non-conception cycles. Intra-follicular cortisol:cortisone ratios increased with the degree of inhibition of 11betaHSD by the hydrophobic FF fractions. FF obtained from conception cycles had significantly higher cortisol:cortisone ratios than samples from non-conception cycles (12.9 +/- 0.3 versus 8.5 +/- 0.2, respectively; P < 0.0001). CONLCUSIONS: Conception by IVF is associated with elevated intra-follicular cortisol:cortisone ratios, which reflect low levels of ovarian stimuli and/or high levels of ovarian inhibitors of type 1 11 beta HSD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available