Journal
NEPHRON CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages C94-C98Publisher
KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000072492
Keywords
acute kidney failure; critical illness; renal replacement therapy; hemofiltration; clearance; dilution
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background/Aims: To determine the impact of replacement fluid infusion site on filter life and azotemic control during continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH). Methods: Pre-dilution CVVH was conducted from February 2001 to December 2001 and then practice was changed to post-dilution (from January 2002 to July 2002). Filter life was prospectively observed and the following data obtained for each filter: starting date and time, ending date and time, heparin use, heparin dose and protamine use. Daily creatinine, urea, INR, APTT and platelet count were also collected. Results: Forty-eight patients were studied (33 in pre-dilution and 15 in post-dilution) for a total of 309 filters (202 in pre-dilution and 107 in post-dilution). The median filter life was significantly shorter in the post-dilution period (18.0 vs. 13.0 h, p=0.021). Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that pre-dilution was a significant independent predictor of increased filter life (p=0.029), together with platelet count (p=0.0035) and heparin dose (p=0.046). There was no significant improvement in daily creatinine and/or urea reduction in the post-dilution period (% Delta creatinine: 7.9 vs. 10.2%/ day, p=0.99, urea: 5.4 vs. 9.7%/day, p=0.78). Conclusions: Post-dilution was associated with reduced filter life without any beneficial effect on daily changes in urea and creatinine levels. Pre-dilution appears a preferable technical approach to CVVH. Copyright (C) 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available