4.5 Article

hnRNP B1 protein may be a possible prognostic factor in squamous cell carcinoma of the lung

Journal

LUNG CANCER
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages 179-186

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5002(03)00226-5

Keywords

hnRNP B1 antibody; lung cancer-early stage; borderline lesion; biomarker; prognostic factor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) 131 is an RNA-binding protein that is required for the maturation of mRNA precursor. It was previously reported that hnRNP A2/B1 was overexpressed at the early clinical stage of lung cancer, and that hnRNP B1 protein, a splicing variant of hnRNP A2 mRNA, was elevated in lung cancer tissues. In this study, we applied the immunohistochemical method, using anti-hnRNP B1 antibody to analyze the usefulness of the hnRNP B1 antibody as a prognostic marker and also as a marker useful for early detection. A total of 206 specimens were examined. Histological examination revealed this protein to be positive in 79 (71.2%) of 111 squamous cell carcinomas and in 45 (64.3%) of 70 adenocarcinomas, respectively. This protein was also expressed in 24 (63.2%) of 38 roentgenographically occult carcinomas and in seven (63.6%) of 11 dysplastic lesions. These findings suggest the possible participation of this protein in early carcinogenesis. Furthermore, the survival curve of the squamous cell carcinoma patients with hnRNP B1 overexpresseion showed a better prognosis compared with that of the patients without hnRNP B1 expression (P = 0.014), whereas in adenocarcinoma patients, there was no such a difference between them (P = 0.889). These findings indicate that hnRNP B1 could be a useful marker for the early detection of bronchogenic squamous cell carcinoma and that it may be a prognostic factor in this cell type. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available