4.7 Article

Racial differences in diabetic nephropathy, cardiovascular disease, and mortality in a national population of veterans

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 26, Issue 8, Pages 2392-2399

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.26.8.2392

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE - To determine racial differences in the prevalence of diabetic nephropathy, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and risk of mortality in a national health care system. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - A longitudinal cohort study was conducted in 429,918 veterans with diabetes. Racial minority groups were analyzed for baseline differences in prevalence of early diabetic nephropathy, diabetic end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and CVD, and longitudinal risk of mortality compared with Caucasians. RESULTS - The 429,918 patients identified with diabetes were of the following racial groups: Caucasian (56.2%), African American (15.3%), Asian (0.5%), Native American (0.4%), and unknown race (21.4%). Minority individuals were, on average, younger and less likely to have CVD but were more likely to have renal disease than Caucasians. After adjustment for age, sex, and economic status, African Americans (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.3, 95% Cl 1.2-1.4) and Native Americans (1.5, 1.1-2.1) were more likely to have early diabetic nephropathy than Caucasians. Diabetic ESRD was more likely to be present in African Americans (1.9, 1.9-2.0), Hispanics (1.4, 1.3-1.4), Asians (1.8, 1.5-2.1), and Native Americans (1.9, 1.5-2.3) than Caucasians. Concurrently, the adjusted OR of CVD in racial minority groups was 27-49% less than in Caucasians, w ereas t e 18-mont ris o mortality among people from most racial minority groups was 7-12% lower than in Caucasians. CONCLUSIONS - We conclude that when access to care is comparable, microvascular complications, macrovascular disease, and subsequent death occur with different frequencies among various racial groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available