3.8 Article

Reexamination of validity and reliability of the CSA monitor in walking and running

Journal

MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
Volume 35, Issue 8, Pages 1447-1454

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000079078.62035.EC

Keywords

accelerometer; physical activity; energy expenditure; measurement; epidemiology

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the CSA (model 7164) accelerometer (MTI) in a wide walking-running speed range in laboratory and field. Method: Twelve male subjects performed three treadmill walking/running sessions and one field trial with the same continuous protocol involving progressively increasing velocities at 5 min per interval from 3 to 6 km(.)h(-1) (walking) and 8 to 20 km(.)h(-1) (running). In the field trial, this protocol was terminated after 35 min (14 km(.)h(-1)), but the trial then extended with 5-km running at a freely chosen velocity. In both scenarios, two CSAs were mounted on each hip and the step frequency measured at each velocity. Oxygen uptake (VO(2)(.)kg(-1)) was measured on the last two treadmill sessions. Correlation analyses were performed for mean CSA output relationship with speed, VO2 per kilogram, and step frequency. Results: In all trials, CSA output rose linearly (R-2 = 0.92, P < 0.001) with increasing speed until 9 km(.)h(-1) but remained at similar to10,000 counts(.)min(-1) during running, thus underestimating VO2 per kilogram at speeds > 9 km(.)h(-1). Estimation errors increased with speed from 11% (P < 0.01) at 10 km(.)h(-1) to 48% (P < 0.001) at 16 km(.)h(-1), when assuming a linear relationship. Freely chosen velocities in the field trial ranged from 10.9 to 16.3 km(.)h(-1). No difference in the CSA-speed relationship was observed between the two scenarios. Differences in CSA output between subjects could partially be attributed to differences in step frequency (R = -0.34 (P = 0.02) for walking and R = -0.63 (P < 0.001) for running). Conclusion: CSA output increases linearly with speed in the walking range but not in running, presumably due to relatively constant vertical acceleration in running. Between-subject reliability was related to step frequency because CSA data are filtered most at higher movement frequencies. Epidemiological CSA data should thus be interpreted with these limitations in mind.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available