4.7 Article

Effect of iron overload and dietary fat on indices of oxidative stress and hepatic fibrogenesis in rats

Journal

LIVER INTERNATIONAL
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 232-242

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0676.2003.00832.x

Keywords

cysteine; fibrogenesis; glutathione; heme oxygenase; iron overload; oxidative stress; polyunsaturated fatty acids

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-51469, HL-52701] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [F32ES05781] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aims: Oxidative stress is presumed to play an important role in hepatic fibrogenesis. Diets high in polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) enhance fibrosis and have been associated with increased oxidative damage in some models of liver injury. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of dietary fat of varying PUFA content on iron-induced oxidative stress and fibrosis. Methods: Rats were given parenteral iron and diets supplemented with coconut oil, safflower oil or menhaden oil. Results: Hepatic iron overload was associated with induction of heme oxygenase-1, a sensitive indicator of oxidative stress, and with modest increases in hydroxyproline and procollagen I mRNA levels without histologically evident fibrosis, all of which were unaffected by dietary fat. In addition, iron loading was associated with increases in cysteine, gamma-glutamylcysteine and glutathione. Dietary fat brought about the expected alterations in peroxidizability, but did not alter indices of oxidative damage. Conclusion: These data highlight the distinction between oxidative stress and oxidative damage and suggest that the former is not sufficient to elicit overt fibrosis. Furthermore, while hepatic iron overload leads to oxidative stress, there is an associated upregulation of antioxidant defenses involving thiol metabolism that may be a critical factor limiting the accumulation of oxidative damage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available