4.5 Article

Oxidative-stress-induced T lymphocyte hyporesponsiveness is caused by structural modification rather than proteasomal degradation of crucial TCR signaling molecules

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 8, Pages 2178-2185

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eji.200323898

Keywords

T lymphocyte; hyporesponsiveness; neutrophil; free radical; proteasome

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In several human pathologies (e.g. cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, AIDS and leprosy) oxidative stress induces T cell hyporesponsiveness. Hyporesponsive T cells often appear to display impaired expression of some (e.g. TCR-zeta, p56(lck) and Lat) but not all (e.g. TCR-alphabeta and CD3-epsilon) crucial TCR-proximal signaling molecules but the underlying mechanisms have as yet not been identified. Using an in vitro system for oxidative-stress-induced T cell hyporesponsiveness we here report two sequential effects of oxidative stress on TCR signaling molecules: protein alterations and proteasomal degradation. We have identified the C-terminal part of TCR-zeta and the membrane-proximal domain of p56(lck) as potential targets for modifications induced by reactive oxygen species. Oxidative-stress-exposed proteins were differentially susceptible to proteasomal degradation: whereas modified TCR-zeta was relatively resistant, reactive oxygen species (ROS)-altered LAT and p56(lck) were much more susceptible. Importantly, we found that T cell hyporesponsiveness best correlated with ROS-dependent protein alteration since inhibition of proteasomal degradation did not restore function. Finally, our data provide an explanation for the paradox of reduced TCR-zeta signals combined with unaltered TCR-alphabeta and CD3-epsilon expression levels: the TCR-zeta chain in hyporesponsive T cells is still expressed but no longer detectable by certain mAb recognizing ROS-sensitive epitopes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available